Услуга · Artificial intelligence

AI adoption strategy

A service for companies that have already decided to move in this direction but do not know where to start. We answer three questions: where the return will be, whether you have enough data and in what order to act so the money is not wasted.

4-6 weeks
for the study
Ranking
return against difficulty
Риски
we say it plainly
Horizon
a year or two ahead

What the work includes

The result is a document for making decisions about money, not a presentation about what modern technology can do.

Discuss the scope

Processes

Where time goes on repetitive operations and what that costs the company over a year.

Data

What has been accumulated, in what form it is stored, whether it is usable. Usually this is exactly where everything stalls.

Ranking

We sort the scenarios by return and difficulty. It is sensible to start with something simple and visible.

Риски

Leakage through the text of prompts, liability for personal data, dependence on an external supplier.

Resources

What will be needed: data, computing power, people, time.

План

A sequence of steps with checkpoints where the decision to continue is taken.

How it goes

The study takes four to six weeks depending on the size of the company.

01

Interviews

We ask the heads of department where their people's hours disappear to.

02

Data

We look at what is actually in the systems rather than what should be there according to the procedure.

03

Ranking

We sort the scenarios by return and effort, explaining each position.

04

Discussion

We present the plan to the management and refine it after the discussion.

A plan with no owner inside the company stays a presentation. Someone has to push it between departments and answer for the result. Without that role the document goes into a folder and comes out a year later unchanged.

Questions and answers

There is no programming here at all, just an answer to two questions: what to tackle and in what order. Companies with an obvious use case do not need this work; they are better going straight to a pilot.

Those who run the candidate areas plus the person responsible for the technology. If the business stands aside, the result is technical work with no connection to the real processes.

A negative result is useful too: the money stays in the company rather than going into a project that would deliver nothing. We would rather say that now is not the time than sell a project we know will not pay off.

We will assess your readiness

Tell us what you expect from the technology and what you have already tried. We will look into it and give an honest assessment.